Mailbag: Forget the Overhead Myth

Q: I know that donors are looking at my administrative costs, and that I'm supposed to keep my overhead low if I want to get good evaluations from watchdog groups...but what does that actually mean?  I can't cut anything else without cutting staff, so...are other people just way better at creative accounting?

A: Yes, there are some donors who are looking at your administrative expenses, popping it over your whole budget and rejecting folks whose ratio doesn't match their ideals.  YOU DON'T NEED THEM. Also, they're really really few and far between.  Asking you about your overhead is a good thing - it keeps us honest, it keeps us mindful of a need to answer to our supporters, to be efficient.  But that's the start of a conversation for most donors, as it should be.  That's not a bad thing at all.

There is, certainly, a big drive in the sector, for accountability and efficiency.  And overhead seems like a good way to measure that.  So let's be kind and say that this is a case of a little knowledge being a dangerous thing - there are donors who've read this far in their official donor orientation handbook and ran out of time, and are now just winging it.  You run into them in the field, and you hear about them in the nonprofit press...and they make a good scary story to tell around the nonprofit campfire, because like all good scary stories, there's enough truth there to make the story seem very very real.

First, head here, to one of my favorite web comics, Savage Chicken.  Have a chuckle, then come right back.

Now, let's talk.

1) How's your overhead?  Are you doing things that make sense?  When you spend money, do you do so intentionally, with reasons you can articulate and stand behind?  How does your board feel about your expenses (overhead and beyond)?

That's right - I'm not asking you about your overhead in comparison to anything - not in ratio with your overall budget, not in comparison to an average for your type of organization, and certainly not by asking how close you can get to zero.  I'm asking why you spend what you do, and why you think that's the right move for your organization and the people you serve.

If you can tell that story, most donors will listen.  ASKING QUESTIONS IS NOT A BAD THING.  Donors should be asking questions, and this is a question that you can expect, so swing for the fences.  You're going to be asked to talk about why you need money, and how much you can do with it!  That's a great place to go in a conversation, and these questions means that the donor is driving you there.  Again - this is fantastic.  A gift, really.

2) Now that I've asked you to tell me a story about what you spend and why, without feeling persecuted by expectations of your overhead, please remember to tell that story to anyone who will listen.  But, of course, it would be stupid not to be prepared to discuss how that number, whatever it is, compares to other numbers in the mind of your prospective donor.

• What's typical overhead for an organization in your field?  How do you compare?  Explain any big differences...could be that you're operating in Nebraska and most are in New York City.  Could be that you're running these two pilot programs that require extra oversight and evaluation.  Could be that you have a commitment to covering full health benefits for all your employees.  
• What's your overhead to program ratio? The question at hand, however you want to break it down: what's the "running the organization" vs. "performing our mission" set of numbers?  And when you think of it like that, you may start to see that a simple ratio from your budget or balance sheet doesn't really describe that accurately.  Say, for example, that you put all your staff in the administrative line...but there are only two of you, and in addition to running the organization, you and your second in command also provide direct services to clients.  So...are you "overhead" or are you "program?"  You don't even need to decide how to categorize yourself - you just need to be able to explain why the numbers themselves need context.
• What other numbers (straight from your financial statements or in comparison to any benchmarks) will draw questions?  Be prepared for questions you can reasonably expect.
• There's no end to the list - but the same rules apply: As long as you can explain your reasons for the way you stack up in various comparisons, being clear and open about your institutional choices is GREAT.  It may help you and some donors see, early on, that you're just not a good fit for each other.  You want - NEED - to let them go.  They'll be dissatisfied with their donations, and you'll drive yourself crazy trying to please them.  

3) Your comment about creative accounting scares the bejesus out of me.  Creative accounting shouldn't be a euphemism, it should be a term of praise for the folks who have figured out how to use the very clear and straightforward rules of GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Practice) to sing nuanced and complex melodies.  Don't ever attempt any kind of deception through your financial statements!  (First of all, it's one of the stupidest things you can do; it's bad form and bad faith, and you can't make up for that by pretending it's justified to help you achieve your mission.  You have to live with your realities, and they are reflected in your numbers.  Second, you'll get caught.  You will.  And that could, perhaps should, destroy your organization, in a shuttering/closing to business/not-existing-anymore sort of way. Don't do it.)

• You should be discussing options with your accountant so that your numbers are "singing" your song.  
• You should be running your basic financial statements by trusted business savvy advisors, for the express purpose of having them tell you what they see in them, what questions they have after reviewing them, etc. (Then you prepare to answer those questions straightforward and with confidence; see above.)
• You should prepare development versions of all your financial statements that attractively lay out all the context and assumptions that folks should find relevant in looking over those numbers.
• IF YOU ARE HOPING TO HIDE anything that you find embarrassing in those numbers, the problem isn't the numbers.  The problem is the embarrassing reality.  So you either need to find a way to confess a one time lapse (you screwed up cash flow your first year on the job and needed to make a withdrawal from savings to make payroll for a couple of months) or change the way you do business so that your practices reflect what you want to tell people you do.  See how that works?